UK arrested Tommy Robinson for reporting child-rape gangs that the government caters to. The UK banned reporting of his arrest, denied him a lawyer, and is trying to have him assassinated in prison. Regardless of how you feel about his views, this is a totalitarian government.

Tommy Robinson isn't the first to that the UK has jailed after a secret trial. Melanie Shaw tried to expose child abuse in a Nottinghamshire kids home -- it wasn't foreigners doing the molesting, but many members of the UK's parliament. The government kidnapped her child and permanently took it away. Police from 3 forces have treated her like a terrorist and themselves broken the law. Police even constantly come by to rob her phone and money. She was tried in a case so secret the court staff had no knowledge of it. Her lawyer, like Tommy's, wasn't present. She has been held for over 2 years in Peterborough Prison. read, read

User talk:Wyatt

From en-Rightpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome

Welcome to Rightpedia, Wyatt! If you have any questions, please look on Special:RecentChanges and find an an Administrator who is around.

Wikimedia Commons images

  • Images existing in Wikimedia Commons do not need to be uploaded since Rightpedia has an extension that imports them. Just type their name. You may notice the slow server throttle you as it slowly downloads and then makes thumbnails from whatever new images you imported, and that is normal.
  • Do *not* tag these with copyright tags or add content to these pages because Wikimedia Commons sometimes deletes these.

Template and signing

  • You simply type four tildes after your post: ~~~~
  • There also may be buttons at the top of your screen:
Per firmare.PNG

Wikipedia copy and paste

  • Content from Wikipedia is extremely boring. If you must import something, please only use the infobox at the top right corner of a Wikipedia article and nothing else.
  • If you must use their text then please only use the introductory paragraphs and then put {{Wikipedia}} at the bottom of the page. The rest of the content should be original.
  • Many articles in the past were wrongly copied and pasted from Wikipedia. These have {{Wikipedia PC}} at the top. Wikipedia articles have lots of garbage that needs to be removed including: categories and templates Rightpedia doesn't use, templates directing people to Wikibooks and Wiktionary, and strange code like "authoritycontrol" not used here.

Copyright

  • Do not import copyrighted texts from other sites whose copyright you do not hold and avoid uploading copyrighted images.

Images

  • When uploading images, see Category:Image copyright templates and use the proper template. You use the templates like this, {{image}} for Rightpedia image (no copyright information) and {{PD image}} for Public domain image. If you forgot to do this when you uploaded it, then please come back and do it.
  • It helps to write a short description in the summary box including where you found the image.

Categories


about edit

I put a summary but it wasn't saved. I removed the image showing America to have the highest prison population because this is often a trope played by race-deniers. America has a high prison population because it has a high population of...you do the math. Some Jews and feminists have said that because the amount of negroes in prison is so high, blacks should not go to prison. And about South Africa, as you know there are no morals in that country, one in five men admit freely that they are gang rapists, that is why they have a low prison population (in addition, the judges would either be black supremacists or white cucks. There is no way a white person with a balanced view would hold a judicial position in modern South Africa)


Why do you continually ignore the questions that I raised (e.g. Icke's unclearness) but discuss things I never complained about (e.g. the deletion concerning "science")?

Since Charlemagne, in Europe, Jews were employed as ADMINISTRATORS and BUREAUCRATS .-)) of kings (and also monasteries collaborated with Jews). This is the reason why (Jewish) doublethink has corrupted white (Wyatt) men and Europe in its cultural foundations.

The manner how you discuss (for instance just in your last answer here → [1]), is the best example thereof. And I think that you should be dismissed as ADMINISTRATOR and BUREAUCRAT .-)) of an allegedly "anti-zionist" Encyclopedia. Please stop your work for the sake of truthfulness. If not, you will be damaging to the cause of WHITE MEN. By arguing like you do, you are actually promoting Jewry.

Since this dishonesty is your personal problem and not mine, we continue this discussion now here on your own "User talk". If you prefer not to answer, I will accept it, but please: if you answer, activate your (forgotten, non-Jewish part of the) brain before starting to write/talk.--SalianLaw (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

David Icke is pretty clear to me. Charlemagne is long after the ancient Greeks; it was when Europeans were worshipping the Jewish God. And the rest of your post, my answer is: lol wut. Wyatt (talk) 08:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Lol, too, wut! Icke is so pretty clear to you because you are clear of any detailed study of him. This is marvelously evident from what you said about him until now. The trouble with you is that you are continually using straw men in your answers. What's your motivation to do that? This is not funny; you are seriously infected! -- I have the impression that, in your case, you hate Jews because, sadly, they are just like your own negative behaviour. Hang it all → be strong and reactivate now your non-Jewish brain!--SalianLaw (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

You're really annoying and you act like you have low-functioning autism. Wyatt (talk) 06:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
I agree, that's him. I call kike on this one mystery man "SalianLaw". --Connor Machiavelli (talk) 11:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

So we consider each other Jews. That’s fine.  :-))

I stopped being annoyed or irritated: I simply fight like Hitler! – You are irritated or annoyed? But then, why don’t you just simply stop answering, if it’s annoying. (Non-attention is worse than contempt.) Or alternatively you could transform me into a banned user.

This tread serves to the training/rescuing of your (and User Connor Machiavelli’s) brain (degenerated by Judaism), that’s for what I fight.

Holmes was, of course annoying for Lestrade (and Gregson) because thinking is an annoying thing since normally we do not think but just reproduce (what we once learned unconsciously (by the Jewish controlled sciences) or for instance from the Electro-Jew (of which Google is also a part of)). I am sure Lestrade often thought that Homes is an idiot or an autist. Anybody who cannot bear the truth (and is caught up in double-doublethink) needs argumentative fallacious arguments (like for instance the straw men or red herrings "abnormal", "autist" etc.) to protect his brain from proper non-Jewish intelligence. This is entirely ok and comprehensible. Bolshewists were experts in diagnosing politically incorrect dissidents with psychiatric diagnoses (which go back to Freud ).

Now you must design a rant speech to talk me down.--SalianLaw (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

You're horrible and a waste of time. --Connor Machiavelli (talk) 20:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

SalianLaw doesn't seem to understand why they hated him at the German Metapedia. Connor thinks he might be a Jew. It reminds me of this article. http://www.dailystormer.com/scotland-high-energy-trump-supporter-interrupts-to-give-out-swastika-golf-balls-to-supporters/ Wyatt (talk) 08:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Well, according to *SemiticLaw, the NWO is actually about love and peace as their mantra and that's political correctness, and our death or something, so love and peace are actually bad or bad to think about. Don't even neoconservatives talk about hate and war? --Connor Machiavelli (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

A note on red herrings and oldspeaks etc.

Wyatt, In politics the red herring is a propaganda instrument to disinform the enemy or its population. In domestic policy the red herring is used to distract from controversial discussions by placing special emphasis on something irrelevant. This is doublethink. It is strange, you say that you hate doublethink, but (from experience I know that) you apply it yourself as soon as someone does not think and act according to your vision how this should be done. Anyway, you have a tendency to lie, if you get angry. This is a bad habit, and as the File:The analogy between the duncecap and the swastika must be studied.jpg here on Rightpedia it is my duty to call your attention to this weak point!

By the way, what do you think about the synoptic correlation between the swastika and the duncecap? --- Further I plan to write an article comparing Owlglass, Sherlock Holmes and Hitler. They all were autodidacts (and pseudointellectuals? and pseudoscientists?)! They all fought against bigotry and hypocrisy (or mind pollution). They all were insulted, killed or nearly (Holmes/Prof. Moriarty) killed by the evil forces. Owlglass was clean, Holmes took cocaine and Hitler was heavily on medications (is this the reason why you asked me the perverse question because you saw a parallel to Hitler?). Owlglass was above time, Holmes was within time and Hitler was a man against time --- I think this assignment could be correct (classification according to Savitri Devi, The Lighting and the Sun, p. 37 ff).

I hope that you look forward to this new attempt to unravel the synoptic analogies of things. There will be no danger of misconception concerning "synopsis" since I will explain in the beginning what the oldspeak meaning of this word once was.

Later on I could write a synoptic article where I compare some interesting oldspeaks ...-----File:The analogy between the duncecap and the swastika must be studied.jpgSalianLaw (talk) 23:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

"swastika and the duncecap" So you're saying you hate national socialism? Maybe you even hate Hinduism and other ancient European religions? Wyatt (talk) 03:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
He clearly does. --Aryan Machiavelli (talk) 08:33, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

You two really should open the shutters of your minds. If you two encourage one another, this is really a kind of folie à deux. The paragons of the fool were Owlglass and Simplicissimus. In these two stories/books, it is demonstrated that they were not fools but they were only disguised as fools. Do you not know these two figures?

They definitely were folk heroes. Hence they must be compared with Hitler. Why not make this comparison?

You are really strange guys. In Wikipedia I had the name “Dankwart 88” (before they banned me, because I was revising German history). I did not know that 88 stands vor “Heil Hitler”. And I chose Dankwart not because of German mythology, but because “Dank” means to think, and “wart” means to be attentive. But one of the administrators said that my name should be forbidden. I.e. he developed a delusion because of his arrogance of ignorance. And I see here that you two just do the same thing: You do know nothing about the noble role of the fools because you do not know world literature (Owlglass, Simplicissimus).

Your narrow-mindedness is not uncommon in the right-wing scene, and I am very concerned about this. You two need urgently to make advances there. To struggle in this direction would make more sense than continually unleash your ignorance on me. You two do not see it yet, and are still scorning, but in truth, I am your most important teacher who would help you to attain your purposes.-----File:The analogy between the duncecap and the swastika must be studied.jpg SalianLaw (talk) 23:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Irrelevant, bastard. --Aryan Machiavelli (talk) 23:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Machiavelli, Yes, I am irrelevant, but you are relevant as bastard. I prove this now: King Lear (Shakespeare) became wise during the time when he was crazy. And his shutters were opened by the fool who gave him helpful advise. So you two hybrids are really suffering from ignorance of your arrogance ... since you do not know the least of Word Literature. :+)) -----File:The analogy between the duncecap and the swastika must be studied.jpg--SalianLaw (talk) 00:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@Wyatt, is Salian ever going to be unbanned? I don't care whether if he is or isn't, though, I'm just wondering. He's entertaining since he's such a laughable idiot. --Aryan Machiavelli (talk) 06:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Salian trolls by intentionally spouting gibberish while mixing it with a lot of orneriness. Then other people get upset at him. I hoped he was going to get better but he grew worse instead. If I only banned him a temporarily, he would return the same. He won't even stop mixing bad English with pseudointellectual babble to make his communication full of screaming gibberish. If he wanted to shit out a turd that no one will read, I woudn't care but he kept bothering everyone else and when spoken to he intentionally spewed gibberish instead of a real communication. Wikipedia banned a guy for doing that at one point. Wyatt (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

No pages on...

Why are there no pages about pizzagate or the Clinton Foundation? Someguy552 (talk) 09:57, 18 February 2018 (MST)

Someone has to spend the time to write them. You could write them. Wyatt (talk) 09:18, 19 February 2018 (MST)