Jewish casualties during World War II
The Jewish casualties during World War II, aka. "The Holocaust", were the Jews who died in forced labor camps during the Third Reich. The "during World War II" bit is because all official counts say they died not during the 1930s, but during the 1940s after WWII began and the Third Reich grew increasingly authoritarian. War is always something that a government likes because it can use it to grow very powerful. It wasn't during peacetime when the Jews in camps died, but during wartime. A root cause of war is violence against children, particularly child abuse. War never changes. The Romans waged war to gather slaves and wealth. Spain built an empire from its lust for gold and territory. Hitler shaped a battered Germany into an economic superpower. In WWI, on the trenches people didn't want to shoot each other and commanders had to start executing soldiers to get them to fight. In the Vietnam War and on, militaries began doing this torturous "boot camp" to break down people's personalities to make them a killer. It's difficult to get the average person to go around killing strangers.
You might be expecting this article to say Hitler Did Nothing Wrong but it will not. The purpose of this article is not to say what did or did not happen, but to supply evidence so you can come to your own conclusion.
Very briefly, most Holocaust revisionists argue that Jews were for several different reasons deported to concentration camps and used for forced labor, suffered many hardships and deaths during the war, but that there was no plan or attempt to genocide Jews, no homicidal gas chambers, and that the number of deaths is greatly exaggerated. The deportation is argued to have been seen as a temporary wartime measure with a permanent Jewish expulsion from Europe to occur after the war. A primary cause of the politically correct view is argued to be wartime Allied psychological warfare which was continued into the postwar period, in part due to this being beneficial for various parties (both non-Jewish and Jewish), in part due to self-perpetuating processes similar to those occurring during witch-hunts.
Related issues include argued continued exploitation of the Holocaust, argued Holocaust uniqueness, argued religious aspects, and the status of the official Holocaust version as an official "Truth" that is in an increasing number of Western countries by law forbidden to be discussed and researched freely and with powerful lobby groups demanding that worldwide censorship on free speech and research must be implemented.
The politically correct view on the Holocaust can be found in numerous easily available sources. This article will mainly describe some of the less often mentioned arguments regarding the Holocaust.
- 1 Holocaustianity
- 2 The Holocaust vs. other claimed large scale killings
- 3 Argued exploitation
- 4 The Holocaust as an official "Truth" and argued non-scientific attacks on Holocaust revisionism
- 5 Revisionist views: Overview and general arguments
- 5.1 What revisionists do not argue
- 5.2 Many earlier Holocaust claims have been admitted to be incorrect
- 5.3 Argued admitted weak mainstream evidence
- 5.4 Argued reasons for the camps and deportations
- 5.5 Hierarchy of evidence
- 5.6 Revisionist views: Material evidence and alleged killing methods
- 5.7 Revisionist views: Documentary evidence
- 5.8 Revisionist views: Testimonies and confessions
- 5.9 Revisionist views: Demographics
- 5.10 Revisionist views: Holocaust awareness
- 5.11 Revisionist views: Fictional descriptions
- 5.12 Revisionist claims regarding other claimed mass killings by National Socialist Germany
- 6 The number of deaths and gas chambers is not the true revisionist narrative
- 7 Jewish victims of the Dresden Holocaust
- 8 Anne Frank went to Auschwitz and was never gassed and when sick was sent to a hospital camp
- 9 At least one SS officer in Auschwitz wanted to protect Jews and other prisoners
- 10 Propagandizing against the Third Reich
- 11 Making questioning The Holocaust illegal is saying the official story is a hoax
- 12 Terminology
- 13 Witness testimony
- 14 Videos
- 15 See also
- 16 References
- 17 External links
Various aspects related to the Holocaust have sometimes been compared with a religion. The term Holocaustianity has been used for phenomenon.
The Holocaust vs. other claimed large scale killings
The Holocaust is often described as a unique event as implied by the term "The Holocaust". The book The Holocaust Industry stated that one reason that this is seen as very important is because "unique suffering confers unique entitlement." The uniqueness claim may also be an important part of Holocaustianity. Even if accepting the politically correct description as correct, then this uniqueness claim is still dubious. There are many large scale killings (real or claimed) throughout human history (including by Jews).
See the article on Holocaust uniqueness.
Various groups are argued to have exploited the politically correct Holocaust version. Some of these arguments accept the politically correct version as correct but still argue that it has been used for exploitation.
Other exploitation arguments rely on the revisionist version of what happened. Revisionists also argue that such exploitation by various groups is the main explanation for why the politically correct version appeared and continues to be influential.
See the article on Holocaust motivations regarding more details.
The Holocaust as an official "Truth" and argued non-scientific attacks on Holocaust revisionism
Censorship, persecution, and prohibition of Holocaust revisionism
The Holocaust is in many Western countries an official "Truth" that is illegal to discuss and research freely. Continued attempts are made to extend such censorship to the remaining Western countries that still allow free debate and research on the issue. In 2014 Russia and Greece implemented "Holocaust denial" laws. Romania in 2015 implemented such a law (with help of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum). Italy in 2016 implemented a "Holocaust denial" law. Lobbying efforts are ongoing in order to make the European Union pass legislation prohibiting free discussion and research in all EU countries.
Some notable convictions for "Holocaust denial" include against David Irving, Ernst Zündel, Fredrick Töben, Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, Germar Rudolf, Horst Mahler, Jean-Marie Le Pen, Jean Plantin, Jürgen Graf, Richard Williamson, Robert Faurisson, Roger Garaudy, Sylvia Stolz, Vincent Reynouard, and Wolfgang Fröhlich.
The number of convicted less well-known individuals is unclear. Germany alone has convicted many thousands of individuals each year for "right-wing" "thought crimes" (but how many of these involved the Holocaust is unclear).
Persecution and/or censorship have occurred also for groups such as defense witnesses and defense lawyers who dispute the politically correct version of the Holocaust or are perceived of doing so.
"Holocaust denial" laws may or may not also include more general prohibitions of free discussion and research on many other aspects of the history of National Socialist Germany. See National Socialist Germany revisionism.
In some countries there may be laws against "genocide denials" more generally but the Holocaust arguably has a special position regarding the amount of criticisms against the official version and also regarding the degree of repression of such criticisms.
Holocaust revisionism and "hate speech"
Official reasons for "Holocaust denial" laws have included that the revisionist arguments are "hate speech" against Jews. One supposed reason for this is that revisionists argue that some Jewish "witnesses" have deliberately lied for various forms of gain. However, this does not mean that all Jews are responsible for these argued lies (in the same way that not all citizens of warring states are responsible for argued war crimes committed by some individuals during a war).
- See the article on Holocaust motivations and the section on "Argued exploitation" on revisionists arguing that many non-Jewish individuals and groups have deliberately lied about and gained from the politically correct version.
- See the article Holocaust awareness on most "Holocaust survivors" never themselves witnessing any genocidal mass killings according to the politically correct version. See also the article Holocaust testimonial evidence on there being many possible reasons for giving inaccurate testimonies other than deliberate, voluntary lying. Thus, criticizing the politically correct Holocaust version does not mean that every "Holocaust survivor" is accused of being a deliberate, voluntary liar.
Revisionists also argue that the political correct version in practice cause collective guilt and hatred against Germans in general and has contributed to large scale crimes against German civilians (see the article on Claimed mass killings of Germans by the WWII Allies). Thus, it is possible to see the politically correct version of the Holocaust as "hate speech".
An established Jewish author who visited a Holocaust revisionist conference wrote regarding hate that "I would see none of it, certainly less than I would see when Jews were speaking of Germans. No one had ever said anything remotely like Elie Wiesel, ‘Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set aside a zone of hate–healthy, virile hate – for what persists in the Germans,’ and no one had said anything like Edgar Bronfman, the president of the World Jewish Congress. A shocked professor told Bronfman once, ‘You are teaching a whole generation to hate thousands of Germans,’ and Bronfman replied, ‘No, I am teaching a whole generation to hate millions of Germans.’"
Also, if the politically correct version is false, then numerous people (including researchers not advocating any form of violence) have been falsely punished in various trials and sometimes executed.
Another official reason is that "Holocaust denial" may increase support for "racism" generally. A counter-argument is that the political correct version and propaganda using it causes hatred against Whites and anti-White policies generally. Furthermore, the politically correct version is used to attempt to suppress/dismiss scientific research on race and even genetics in general which causes ill-informed and therefore often harmful decisions for society in general.
Another argued reason for "Holocaust denial" laws consists of ad hominem by arguing that the researchers are far right. However, Germar Rudolf have argued that "the extreme right wing" are only a small minority among revisionists researchers who span the political spectrum including the far left.
There may also be illogical circular reasoning, such as Holocaust denialism being dangerous, since if it is proven that the National Socialists did not commit a genocide then this may revive National Socialism which is dangerous, since National Socialism committed a genocide.
More generally revisionists argue that historical research in general and science more broadly often may cause perceived offense for some individuals or groups. This is in other cases not seen as a reason for censoring science.
More unofficial reasons for laws against "Holocaust denial" may be that the evidence supporting the politically correct version is weak and cannot stand open debate, that many groups have gained from and have vested interests in the politically correct version, pathological altruism, and white guilt and exploitation of such guilt. Comparisons have also been made with blasphemy laws. See the Holocaustianity article.
The term "Holocaust denial" and straw man revisionism
The term "Holocaust denial" instead of "Holocaust revisionism" is disfavored by revisionists since "denialism" is sometimes interpreted as meaning denying reality. Also, only some aspects are denied while other are accepted. In addition, revisionists do not deny some events but argue that the politically correct version of what happened is incorrect. Furthermore, non-revisionists are argued to incorrectly deny, minimize, and/or ignore many events as described elsewhere in this article. The term "Holocaust denial" can be seen as a form of ad hominem.
This usage can also be seen as only one part of a more general straw man revisionism where what revisionists argue is misrepresented or anti-revisionists only replying to old arguments while ignoring newer research (such as only replying to the first Leuchter Report while ignoring later reports and arguments on Zyklon B derivatives measurements, see the article on Holocaust material evidence).
Another problematic term is soft Holocaust denial.
Agreement among Holocaust revisionists
Another example of straw man revisionism is by claiming that revisionists are extremely divided regarding what happened. Instead, most scholarly revisionists likely generally agree on what is argued to have happened, although they may disagree on specific details. The exception to this are a few who support Holocaust revisionism lite views, as discussed in the article on this topic.
The revisionist version is often criticized as being a "conspiracy theory" which is implied to be dubious in itself. However, it is now admitted that the Allies made false claims of Germans atrocities for propaganda purposes and in order to deceive the general public already during the First World War. Examples include false allegations of production of human soap, false allegations of mass atrocities against the Belgian civilian population, and false allegations of hundreds of thousands Serbs being killed by methods such as poisonous gas.
A common straw man is to state that revisionists argue that everything is part of an exclusively Jewish and carefully planned conspiracy. As noted in the article Holocaust motivations revisionists have instead argued that there were and are many different parties who would have had or have an in interest in supporting Holocaust propaganda for variety of different reasons. An especially important Holocaust propaganda producer is often argued to have been Stalin's Soviet Union despite the Jewish influence having been greatly reduced during the Great Purge before the war. Furthermore, all the Allies need not necessarily have planned the wartime propaganda together but may instead have copied, imitated, and added to useful propaganda from other Allies without any central coordination.
Furthermore, also the non-revisionist version involves a "conspiracy theory". Germans are argued to already in 1941 while they were victorious to have started to massively falsify and ignore their official communications and written orders and instead rely on secret "code words" and verbal orders. The Germans involved in the argued conspiracy also almost totally destroyed all traces of the millions of corpses from the mass murders ("Aktion 1005") and almost all incriminatory documents (but supposedly instead confessed the mass murders in recorded public speeches, did not kill the massive numbers of potential witnesses alive in the camps at the end of the war, and did not destroy the other evidence argued to support the non-revisionist version).
In the summer of 1944 Soviet Union forces reached the first concentration camp, Majdanek. There they found, according to revisionists, crematories, delousing chambers, and cans of Zyklon B, which had been used to save lives but which were turned by Soviet propaganda into their opposite. The Soviet Union also released photos of skeletons laying next to cremation furnaces (which must have been staged according to revisionists since cremation would not have produced such a result). Germans (not part of the alleged Aktion 1005) did destroy crematories after this but this is argued to be due to a likely desire to avoid similar future false propaganda. Also, at Auschwitz neither the alleged gas chambers or a massive amount of camp documents were destroyed and the remaining prison population (potential witnesses) was not killed (in particular, the Sonderkommando members allegedly working in the gas chambers were not killed). This is argued to demonstrate that the purpose was to prevent Soviet crematoria propaganda but not to conceal the existence of the alleged mass gassings.
Regarding individuals who, for example, may have used coercive methods on National Socialists in order to obtain confessions, this must not necessarily be due to being part of a secret conspiracy but may have been due to a sincere belief that the Holocaust did occur according to the politically correct version and that coercion was needed to obtain confessions from lying perpetrators. Similarly, even individuals who may have fabricated/edited Nationalist Socialist documents must not necessarily have been part of a conspiracy but may have done so, for example, in order to ensure convictions of accused that were viewed as guilty even if clear evidence for this was lacking. Furthermore, possibly deliberately false witness testimonies need not have been due to the witnesses being part of a secret conspiracy but may have been due to coercion, personal gain, group gain, and/or a variety of other factors as discussed elsewhere.
Revisionists have differed regarding what degree they see the politically correct Holocaust version as being deliberately fabricated. For example, some have viewed documents often cited as evidence for the Holocaust as fabricated/edited, others have viewed them as authentic but misinterpreted. Many would likely argue that much of the initial wartime propaganda was (like the WWI wartime propaganda) at first deliberately fabricated by various parties but that many others started to sincerely believe that the claims were true. Such views were immensely strengthened and seen as verified at the end of the war by the discovery of some camps which did contain many corpses. Regarding the continuation of the wartime propaganda into the postwar period, some have seen this as deliberately organized falsehoods (especially by Stalin's Soviet Union), others as akin to the European witch hunts and witch trials which self-propagated into a massive movement in which many of the participants sincerely believed (based numerous "witnesses", "confessors", and other forms of "evidence") that witches existed and needed to be severely persecuted for the good of society.
Revisionist views: Overview and general arguments
What revisionists do not argue
Germar Rudolf has stated that "Most people have misconceptions about what Holocaust revisionists (frequently pejoratively labeled as “Holocaust deniers” or “negationists”) claim and what they do not claim. This is caused by disinformation spread by the mass media, some of it due to journalists innocently yet irresponsibly copying from others, some of it spread with malicious intend. The brief list below is meant to give you a brief overview as to what we revisionists say and what we do not say... Not all revisionist scholars might agree with all the points listed, but in general the broad consensus among us does probably look like this:"
|They deny that Jews were persecuted||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny that Jews were deprived of civil rights||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny that Jews were deported||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny the Jews were herded into ghettos||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny the existence of concentration camps||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny that Jews were put to forced labor||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny the existence of crematoria in concentration camps||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny that Jews died for a great number of reasons: epidemics, malnutrition, diseases, mistreatment||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny that other minorities were also persecuted as well, such as gypsies and political dissenters||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny that the treatment of the Jews was unjust||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny the victims their dignity||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny the victims to be remembered||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny to show compassion for the victims||Wrong They do not deny this|
|They deny that there was a plan to murder all Jews||Correct This is what they claim|
|They deny that Jews were murdered systematically||Correct This is what they claim|
|They deny the existence of gas chambers for mass murder||Correct This is what they claim|
|They deny that six million Jews died in the Holocaust||Correct This is what they claim|
Many earlier Holocaust claims have been admitted to be incorrect
Revisionists argue that many early Holocaust claims which were presented as definite truths have later been admitted to be incorrect. For example, during war crimes trials claims were made that that Germany produced human soap out of human fat and artifacts made from human skin. Allied prosecutors produced evidence to support these charges. Similarly, claims were made of large scale mass gassings in western Holocaust camps in Germany itself. Today, many of these allegations have been abandoned or modified. It is still argued that large scale mass gassings occurred in camps in Poland (and sometimes comparatively small scale gassings in western camps) but revisionists argue that the evidence for these claims is not qualitatively different from the evidence for the claims that have now been abandoned regarding the western Holocaust camps. There were also earlier false propaganda claims of Germany committing atrocities during the First World War.
A 2014 revisionist articles stated that in 1986, experts estimated 1.38 million Jewish deaths at the Majdanek camp. Today the curator of the camp museum claims just 59,000 fatalities—a reduction of 96%. Prior to 1990, 4 million were argued to have died at Auschwitz. On July 17 of that year, the Washington Times announced: "Poland reduces Auschwitz death toll estimate to 1 million." The estimated number of homosexuals who died in the camps have seen a drop from 500,000 to perhaps 5,000.
See Alleged Holocaust demographics: Five million killed non-Jews claim on Simon Wiesenthal inventing this number.
See also the Nuremberg trials article regarding problems such as now admitted use of torture in order to get confessions and admitted document forgeries.
Argued admitted weak mainstream evidence
Revisionists have argued that some mainstream historians have in effect admitted that the evidence supporting the politically correct version is very weak.
Argued reasons for the camps and deportations
See the Holocaust motivations article.
Hierarchy of evidence
Revisionists argue that in courts there is a generally agreed on hierarchy regarding how valuable different forms of evidence are (the most valuable mentioned first):
- Material evidence (for example, gas chambers, corpses)
- Documentary evidence (for example, National Socialist documents)
- Neutral witness testimony (for example, by Red Cross inspectors of camps)
- Party testimony (for example, "Holocaust survivor" statements, trial "confessions", political speeches by National Socialists, and so on)
The evidence argued to support the non-revisionist version is argued to mostly consist of the weakest form of evidence (party testimony).
The following sections will roughly follow this hierarchy.
Revisionist views: Material evidence and alleged killing methods
Revisionist views: Documentary evidence
Revisionist views: Testimonies and confessions
Revisionist views: Demographics
Revisionist views: Holocaust awareness
See Holocaust awareness.
Revisionist views: Fictional descriptions
Revisionist claims regarding other claimed mass killings by National Socialist Germany
The number of deaths and gas chambers is not the true revisionist narrative
For the title of this piece, "The Jewish casualties during World War II", the deaths in the German government's camps were not the only time an authoritarian government caused the deaths of many civilians and it was not even the largest death toll. Many genocides can be called a Holocaust.
The many deaths of civilians during the Third Reich were something that always happens under an authoritarian government. Mao is typically listed as the highest at 74 million. The Soviet Union in total had about 100 million during The Red Holocaust, about 22 million of which was Stalin but Stalin went around killing off the other Communist mass murderers, like Yagoda and Trotsky for being competitors when the Communist Jews of the early Soviet Union were all mass murderers (both gulags and events like the Holodomor). Communist China today likes to kidnap Buddhist monks to harvest their organs. Even in the 21st century in South East Asia, occasionally a new president will pop up promising to end the drug trade and mass-execute a lot of drug dealers.
What everyone tells you about The Holocaust is that not only was it the biggest and the only event of its kind, but also the perpetrators of it were the German people. The actual perpetrators of all mass civilian deaths under an authoritarian government is in fact the authoritarian government itself. National Socialist Germany got most of its positive ideas like its economic system, environmentalism, having healthy citizens, and animal welfare from people the government later killed in The Night of the Long Knives and the Thule Society which the Third Reich later shut down after it came to power. The Third Reich didn't execute members of the Thule Society like Weimar Germany did though. The Third Reich also didn't ban guns like Weimar Germany did either, they simply repealed Weimar Germany's gun control laws except for a few groups of people like Jews, gypsies, criminals and Communists. After Germany lost, guns and swords were completely banned and it remains so today as the German government floods Germany with hostile foreign invaders in an effort to wipe out its people.
However everything you have been told is that it was the German people themselves who were responsible for the deaths in concentration camps. But the German people had no idea anyone was dying. They were shown pictures of how Auschwitz had a swimming pool, shop, football fields, basketball courts, hospital, library, brothel, concert hall, tennis court, music bands, rabbit breeding programs, horse stables, and more. The Red Cross also was regularly visiting Auschwitz to make sure the inmates were treated well. The Soviet Union never did that for their forced labor camps. And The Red Cross came out believing the inmates were treated properly. There are claims that Auschwitz was staged for the Red Cross like how in Arizona jails (not prisons), they only run the air conditioning on the day the inspectors are there, but in the end the German people and Red Cross believed the prisoners in the concentration camps were treated kindly. The German government even used the euphemism "concentration camp" instead of "forced labor camp", which is what they were.
However everything you learn is that those responsible are the German civilians who had no idea. And everything you are told is that the way to prevent another incident like this is not to keep governments from becoming authoritarian but simply to exterminate the German people. German politicians today such as Gregor Gysi say this today that exterminating all the German people will mean no more "nazis". But there are still non-European people taking up the Hollywood Nazism theme, such as Amerindian, Jeff Weise, who killed a bunch of people in a murder-suicide. Still the crimes of an authoritarian government that briefly held power in Germany are blamed on its people who had no idea. It is used as an excuse to genocide all the German people and often all European people as well.
The Holocaust narrative also hides how most people felt about Jews at the time. Why did Hitler have such trouble deporting Jews? Jews have been kicked out of over 110 countries in their history but after a bunch of atheist Jews created Communism, they convinced most of the Jews to believe in it. Then these Communist Jews founded the Soviet Union and started genociding tens of millions of people in there. Jews from the Third Reich were trying to leave Germany long before WWII but nobody would take them. There was even a famous ship, the MS St. Louis, where Jews sailed all over trying to find a place to go to. The Third Reich was able to convince Palestine to take some in but it was really hard to get anyone else to take them in. The Communist Jews also are not separate from the rich capitalist banker Jews. They're the same bunch. Communism was funded by rich banker Jews. Even the kindest of Communist Jews, Bernie Sanders, who claims to merely be a socialist is super rich. But most Communist Jews were like Saul Alinsky who was similar the Communist Jews such as George Soros of today. So let's say there's millions of clones of George Soros all wanting into your country, who will infiltrate and overthrow your government? That is how people felt about Jewish immigrants then.
For an example of a government doing something versus its people, there's the Amerindians in the USA (Native Americans). Many tribes such as the Comanche would abduct white people and then spend all day torturing, gang raping, and horribly mutilating the white victims' bodies--even the female members of the tribe did this. They usually did this to underage girls and when the girls got pregnant, they would cook and eat the babies. In this instance, it was the whole tribe so it was all the Comanche people during this. During the harm the US government did to the Amerindians, the majority of white people did not participate and had no idea. White people mainly were busy intermarrying and race mixing with the Amerindians. For another example, The Gaza Holocaust: The Israeli Jewish people were fully aware of the genocide and they all cheered it on publicly. Israeli civilians would go out and watch the genocide of Palestinians for entertainment. German civilians never sat outside of Auschwitz eating popcorn, watching people die. Israelis celebrated the Palestinian deaths all over social media. One Jewish woman said she had an orgasm every time she heard Palestinian children died.
Also in Eisenhower's death camps, nearly 2 million Germans were starved to death and forced to stand nonstop for months on end without food and little water. If they had to poop, they had to do it standing or be shoot and this got their legs infected. Civilians were forbidden from helping the POWs. As for civilian deaths in forced labor camps, Stalin was part of the Allied forces since the beginning when he made the deal with the UK to convince Hitler to a joint invasion Poland but the UK and France would only declare war on Germany rather than the USSR. Now of course civilians died in Germany's forced labor camps and it was horrible, but the civilians who died in Allied forced labor camps were a far greater number and this has continued to be hidden by the mainstream media and the ZOG education system. The state is the greatest criminal organization of all time and always mass murdering people. Comparing states is like comparing slave masters; it's just that the Allied governments were even worse than the Third Reich when it came to war crimes.
Jewish victims of the Dresden Holocaust
Stefan Molyneux said that the Jewish ancestors in his family tree came from Berlin, Germany. Unlike the official narrative, they were never sent to concentration camps. That's an important point. Hitler didn't have every Jew go to the concentration camps. He even had a Jew, Erhard Milch, in charge of aircraft production. Hitler in 1940 even wrote a letter to make sure his Jewish WWI commander, Ernst Hess, was kept safe. Hess lived until September 14, 1983 (aged 93).
So back to Stefan's relatives. They weren't put in concentration camps, instead, when WWII broke out, they moved from Berlin to Dresden, Germany because it was purely civilian and they believed they would be safe from the war. During the Bombing of Dresden in World War II, some of his Jewish ancestors escaped but others did not and they were burned alive. All that was ever found was the metal clasp of a female relative's purse. The bombing is sometimes called a "firestorm" because there was so much fire that it sucked all the oxygen out of everywhere! After the bombing of Dresden ended, then citizens came back and rescue crews came in, but then the Allied forces returned to bomb the survivors and rescue crews. More innocent civilians died in Dresden than in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (those two cities in Japan were bombed after peace talks had begun).
The etymology of Holocaust refers to burning and that's what happened to Dresden civilians. The bombing of Dresden was to attack civilians and was purely a war crime. No one was ever prosecuted for it. Instead, the casualties are denied to this day. The 2015 population of Dresden was 780,561 in the urban area with the surrounding metro area (suburbs) being 1,143,197 people. The German government listed the casualties of the Dresden Holocaust at 200,000 people. Western allies however used Holocaust Denial and claimed it was only 25,000. Seeing the population in 2015, the figure of 200,000 might even be a low estimate. However the Holocaust Denial continues to this day claiming 25,000 people died rather than a real figure.
Not only did mainstream media and ZOG governments deny the Dresden Holocaust, no one was ever prosecuted for it. Even worse, all those responsible for the genocide at Dresden were honored as war heroes!
Anne Frank went to Auschwitz and was never gassed and when sick was sent to a hospital camp
Anne Frank in her official kosher narrative first was sent to Auschwitz. The official narrative says all children at Auschwitz were gassed, but her official narrative says she was not. She labored at Auschwitz and got sick there. The official narrative says all people who got sick at Auschwitz were gassed. But her official narrative says she was not and instead sent to Bergen-Belsen camp, which the official narrative admits was turned into a hospital for sick Jews. Many still died of disease, including Anne Frank. All the piles of corpses seen in photos of The Holocaust were from Bergen-Belsen and from people who died of disease, mainly typhus. Some Jews in Bergen-Belsen recovered though and when the camp was liberated, they went and murdered most of the guards and kapos (prisoners that cooperated with the guards) in revenge.
At least one SS officer in Auschwitz wanted to protect Jews and other prisoners
Hans Münch, nicknamed The Good Man of Auschwitz, did everything he could to keep inmates alive. Before Auschwitz was shut down, Hans gave Jewish inmate, Louis Micheels, his gun to help him escape. Many witnesses testified that Hans only did good toward the Jews there. He was the only person acquitted of war crimes at the 1947 Auschwitz trials in Kraków, where many inmates testified in his favor.
Propagandizing against the Third Reich
The reason why you hear all about The Holocaust and not other genocides is to hide those other genocides from you. Whenever you see the mainstream sources pushing a story, the question to ask is: What are they using that story to cover up?
They are always covering something else much worse up.
The Third Reich was heavily propagandized with attacks before WWII, during WWII, and continuing to this day. However the Allied forces had the USSR, the nation that did the biggest genocides in the 20th century as its allies and Stalin one of their largest mass murderers was their ally. The mainstream media and Allied governments praised the USSR and Stalin as a good guy. Stalin killed far more Jews than Hitler ever did. Stalin also killed over 20 million civilians and the Communist Jew leaders of the early USSR had killed several times this before Stalin came to power. He even used gas chambers although the main USSR policy since it began was working people to death and slowly starving them.
The Allied nations also stood back and let Mao in Communist China murder approximately 74 million. Communist China to this day continues to kidnap Buddhist monks and harvest their organs. None of the NATO nations have ever done anything to stop this or to try to free Tibet.
The reason for the heavy propaganda against Hitler are two reasons:
- 1) Zionists and Communists rule the world and the Third Reich opposed them. These forces continue to rule the world today.
- 2) The Allied war crimes were far greater than those of the Third Reich.
- The Allied forces were always preferring to bomb civilians at night while the Third Reich preferred to bomb during the day and hit military targets only. The Allies hit a lot of them, some famous ones: The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (those two cities in Japan were bombed after peace talks had begun). The Bombing of Dresden resulted in far more deaths than those cities combined and it was meant to terrorize a civilian population who had no ability to vote Hitler out of power and to this day the mainstream media, ZOG, and places like Wikipedia deny this Holocaust claiming 10x less died there than actually did.
- Also in Eisenhower's death camps, nearly 2 million Germans were starved to death and forced to stand nonstop for months on end without food and little water. If they had to poop, they had to do it standing or be shoot and this got their legs infected. Civilians were forbidden from helping the POWs. As for civilian deaths in forced labor camps, Stalin was part of the Allied forces since the beginning when he made the deal with the UK to convince Hitler to a joint invasion Poland but the UK and France would only declare war on Germany rather than the USSR. Now of course civilians died in Germany's forced labor camps and it was horrible, but the civilians who died in Allied forced labor camps were a far greater number and this has continued to be hidden by the mainstream media and the ZOG education system. The state is the greatest criminal organization of all time and always mass murdering people and comparing states is like comparing slave masters, it's just that the Allied governments were even worse than the Third Reich when it came to war crimes.
The war crimes of the Allied nations continued into the 21st century. For instance, the depleted uranium the US government used in the Iraq War has a half-life longer than the life of the planet. This depleted uranium has irradiated Iraq more than Hiroshima, Nagasaki, or even Chernobyl. Chernobyl to day is uninhabitable but people have to live in Iraq. Iraq has more birth defects than anywhere else and the genetic damage is extreme.
The Holocaust narrative is not only to control gentiles, but also to control Jews. Most Jews alive today actually believe there will be another shoah. This propaganda to control Jews is called Holocaust Hysteria. It is to prevent Jewish dissent against the various corrupt Jewish organizations out there such as the ADL or the state of Israel, and instead gets most Jews to support them.
The Third Reich's forced labor camps gave prisoners one day off per week for recreation. Allied governments did not do this in their forced labor camps.
Making questioning The Holocaust illegal is saying the official story is a hoax
The Holocaust is the only incident where in most countries it is illegal to even question the official story. Even where it's legal, people are still persecuted heavily for it. In contrast people can go around celebrating Mao Zedong, the greatest mass murderer of the 20th century, and nothing happens to them. This is because Germany lost WWII. As for "Holocaust Denial", it's completely allowed to claim most mass genocides did not happen. The Irish Holocaust is taught today as not the truth that the Irish people lived as basically slaves and the British military robbed all their non-potato crop which caused 5.5 million to starve to death, but that the Irish themselves were to blame and the number of deaths was decreased to 1 million.
In the aftermath of the war, within their own circles Jews originally used the Hebrew term Shoah ( שואה ) meaning "calamity" to refer to what happened to Jews in forced labor camps under the Third Reich during World War 2. Jews often use this word amongst themselves, especially in Israel where they speak Hebrew more than English. The Talmud had an older story of mass Jewish deaths that happened in Ancient Roman times that the Talmud also calls a shoah. This would make The Holocaust, the second Shoah rather than the first.
The term Holocaust (Greek: Holókauston) is an ancient term referring to an animal sacrifice offered to a god in which the whole (olos) animal is completely burnt (kaustos). It has been used in modern Western history to describe great massacres. The word was also used to describe the collective experience of world history during the 20th century (World War I, World War II and the looming Cold War) as a result of the industrialization of warfare including the bombing of civilian towns from the skies and the creation and use of nuclear weapons. A prominent example of this usage can be taken from the final speech of Dwight Eisenhower in 1961.
Usage of the term to describe treatment of Jews by the Hitler government began, astonishingly, before the events the term came to refer to reportedly took place, with the New York Times referring to Jewish sufferings in Germany as "the European holocaust" as early as 1936. Since WWII, it came to refer mainly to the Jewish suffering in forced labor camps under The Third Reich while WWII was going on.
The official Holocaust narrative is that there is no physical evidence for gas chambers because the German government destroyed it all. There were piles and piles of wedding rings, piles of glasses, piles of tooth fillings, and so on but no gas chambers. Camps like Bergen-Belsen had piles of starved corpses who died of typhus. But according to the narrative, all bodies the German government gassed, shot, or directly murdered they hid.
If you go to a Holocaust museum and they claim a building is a gas chamber, further investigation will find that the Soviet Union created the building after the war and they did it very, very poorly. The Soviet reconstructions of gas chambers have chimneys connected to nothing, doors and windows that open from the inside, glass windows and wooden doors that are easy to break open, and leaky buildings where gas would escape all over the camp. These reconstructed gas chambers have no residue of Zyklon B. Sometimes a Holocaust museum will use a delousing chamber and claim it is a gas chamber. Still the official narrative always is that the German government destroyed all evidence of gas chambers. In the 2010s, extensive digging underneath Treblinka found a single tile that is supposed to be evidence.
Everything from the Nuremburg trials was witnesses. The trials did have the Wannsee Conference document that kept mentioning "the final solution" of the Jews, but you can search the document here. Try searching for: gas chamber, Zyklon B, diesel, bullet, kill, murder, or genocide. No results. The document, which revisionists claim is a fake, states at most, "Under proper guidance, in the course of the final solution the Jews are to be allocated for appropriate labor in the East. Able-bodied Jews, separated according to sex, will be taken in large work columns to these areas for work on roads, in the course of which action doubtless a large portion will be eliminated by natural causes." Natural causes does not mean direct murder. These were forced labor camps. Throughout human history, forced labor camps are where people are worked to death.
Kurt Franz was deputy commandant under Eberl and Stangl and the last commandant of Treblinka II. He created a photo album named Schöne Zeiten. This was against the rules and he kept it secret from everyone else. This album included incriminating evidence such as mechanized grave digging, but never did it have any photos of gas chambers.
Witness testimony had a lot of unreliable aspects. Some people like to create stories of how they repeatedly infiltrated camps and escaped over and over again as part of a resistance effort which other survivors of the camps say are lies. Others made up things that are considered false such as Herman Rosenblat. There are also stories considered false today such as killing Jews and turning them into soap and making lampshades out of their skin.
Films like Schindler's List contains everything that the mainstream Holocaust narrative says is false and that film says it all happened.
During the 1985 trial of Ernst Zündel for holocaust revisionism, Arnold Friedman, prisoner number B14515, said he could tell whether fat or skinny people, Ukrainians or Poles, were being cremated by looking at the color of the smoke.
- The True Costs of War: Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio speaks at the University of Toronto
- Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 15: Germar Rudolf: Lectures on the Holocaust—Controversial Issues Cross Examined 2nd, revised and corrected edition. http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=15
- Why Romania had to ban Holocaust denial twice https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/07/27/why-romania-had-to-ban-holocaust-denial-twice/
- WJC Approves Resolution Calling for Ban of Public Holocaust Denial http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/wjc-approves-resolution-calling-for-ban-of-public-holocaust-denial.premium-1.519763
- The Prohibition of Holocaust Denial. http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2009/volume_1/number_2/the_prohibition_of_holocaust_denial.php
- German Rudolf's Website. http://germarrudolf.com/
- World War I Atrocity Propaganda and the Holocaust, Is There a Lesson Here? http://www.codoh.com/library/document/363/
- Anti-German Propaganda during WWI http://codoh.com/library/document/916/
- The Bryce Report, Report of the Committee on Alleged German Outrages http://codoh.com/library/document/905/
- Why the Germans Destroyed the Crematoria but left the Gas Chambers Intact http://codoh.com/library/document/977/
- Paul Eisen. But how could the Holocaust not be true? http://codoh.com/library/document/1970/
- How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf Höss. Journal for Historical Review. Retrieved on 11 March 2012. http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_Faurisson.html
- The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Webera.html
- Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 1: Germar Rudolf (ed.): Dissecting the Holocaust—The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’ 2nd, revised edition. http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1
- Thomas Dalton. The Great Holocaust Mystery: Reconsidering the Evidence. http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2014/volume_6/number_3/the_great_holocaust_mystery.php
- The Non-Jewish Stake in the Holocaust Mythology: Why the Continued Success of a Failed Ideology? http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2010/volume_2/number_1/non_jewish_stake_in_holocaust_mythology.php
- It says it early on somewhere in http://jonsjailjournal.blogspot.com
- Research Rachel Plummer and Matilda Lockhart from the 1800s
- The Truth About The Native American Genocide
- Hellstorm - The Real Genocide of Nazi Germany (Documentary w/ Subtitles)
- https://www.statistik.sachsen.de/download/010_GB-Bev/Bev_Z_Gemeinde_akt.pdf Statistisches Landesamt des Freistaates Sachsen (in German). July 2016.
- Horror Of US Depleted Uranium In Iraq Threatens World at Rense.com
- "Americans Appeal for Jewish Refuge." The New York Times. May 31, 1936. Initially the Times quotes an Episcopalian clergyman, then adopts the phrase without quotes. 
- Tiles found in Treblinka confirm existence of gas chambers