UK arrested Tommy Robinson for reporting child-rape gangs that the government caters to. The UK banned reporting of his arrest, denied him a lawyer, and is trying to have him assassinated in prison. Regardless of how you feel about his views, this is a totalitarian government.

Tommy Robinson isn't the first to that the UK has jailed after a secret trial. Melanie Shaw tried to expose child abuse in a Nottinghamshire kids home -- it wasn't foreigners doing the molesting, but many members of the UK's parliament. The government kidnapped her child and permanently took it away. Police from 3 forces have treated her like a terrorist and themselves broken the law. Police even constantly come by to rob her phone and money. She was tried in a case so secret the court staff had no knowledge of it. Her lawyer, like Tommy's, wasn't present. She has been held for over 2 years in Peterborough Prison. read, read

National Socialism

From en-Rightpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The ensign of the NSDAP.
National Socialist values
Unlike the lies of Hollywood Nazism, this is what modern Neo National Socialists look like. An example is Evalion.

National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), abbreviated as NS or shorthanded as NatSoc, is a socio-economic political worldview of revolutionary nationalism, which combines national solidarity amongst the people of a nation with socialism, it was realized from 1933 to 1945 as a sovereign national party system in the Greater German Empire. Adolf Hitler erected National Socialism as "the political doctrine of the national community." (See AH's Pre-election speech.) The basic ideas were a healthy shaping of characters and a national altruism, contrary to atomized liberal ideas of individualism. The National Socialist worldview is neither purely "Right" nor purely "Left" on the old spectrum, but presents itself as a broad-based popular social nationalist movement and is aimed at involving all classes of the national body for the greater good of the people as a whole. Splintering directions and parties were eliminated under NS because they were considered weakening to the nation by creating political self interest. Due to the low German birth rates and high Jewish control and employment as a result of The Versailles Diktat, racial awareness took center stage under chancellor Hitler.

The Thule Society was a group that helped come up with the prototype of what Hitler named and developed as National Socialism. It has nothing to do with the way Hollywood Nazism portrays it and it can be implemented in a way beyond a very strict fascistic style of government, to a government that allows many personal freedoms. National Socialism is portrayed in typically as a very authoritarian government but this does not have to be so entirely. Since it was inspired by the Thule Society, it was, in part, based on the ancient Germanic and Norse communities, before the Vikings. These were peaceful communities with activities like farming, manufacturing, and services where everyone cooperated with the community. The Vikings did not become warriors until conflicts with other nations.[1] National Socialism was created in reaction to capitalism and Communism. Capitalism is a Libertarian-invented doctrine that is all about the individual. If you make a lot of money by harming many other people that's considered to be fine by capitalist society. Communism is a Judeo-Masonic doctrine about the collective; your life belongs to the government and you need to work for the government or you die and you'll probably die by the government anyways. The idea of National Socialism is that the economy has to serve the people. National Socialism allows private businesses, but if something hurts the people then it's not allowed. For instance in National Socialism, if you tried to outsource jobs then the government would prevent it because it may make you a lot richer but it hurts your fellow people. So, National Socialists do oppose both capitalism and Marxism.[2] The Thule Society also was the group that promoted the use of the swastika before Hitler learned it.

National Socialism expressed its commitment to the German people, contrary to rival systems such as Marxism and liberal-capitalism. It also opposed the efforts of Jewish supremacists to infiltrate and take-over the national body politics in historically developed nations, regarding Judaism as an existential threat to all peoples; thus, it placed a significant focus on the Jewish Question. The National Socialists, unlike Fascists, sought not the totality of the state, but the claim to the totality of the idea in its entirety in the political life of the people. The idea that National Socialism as a wholesale system could be transported to other nations was regarded with heavy skepticism by Adolf Hitler, although there were cousin revolutionary nationalist movements inline with the general spirit of the age.

The economic program of the National Socialists was laid out in a booklet by Gottfried Feder, looking to "break interest slavery", promoting worker profit sharing in large companies, the expansion of social welfare legislation, the fight against land speculation, and the municipalization of the department stores. Unlike Bolshevism, it did not propose to eliminate all private enterprise and private ownership of property, but rather aimed to protect the general public against the excesses of plutocrats unrestrained by any sense of patriotic group solidarity.



Adolf Hitler, founder and leader of the National Socialist Revolution.

Nationalism from the perspective of the National Socialist conception means appreciation and preservation of one's own body politic with respect to folkish interests of other nations. Blind chauvinism, which has the degradation and damage to other people's body as a goal, is rejected. The idea of internationalists that seeks to destroy all nations through rootless cosmopolitanism and miscegenation was fought by the NSDAP. This idea of internationalists was embodied by liberal-capitalists, plutocracy, Cultural Bolshevists, Marxists and international Jewry.

Adolf Hitler himself described National Socialism as "the political doctrine of the national community." Nationalism, he understood it as the devotion of the individual to his ethnic community, socialism as a responsibility of the individual to the national community. Nationalism and socialism were at their core synonyms for Hitler; namely, self-sacrifice for the wider ethnic folk:

The Jewish manipulated Marxist concept of class struggle stands in the way of national unity:

Most of the small nationalist groups agreed to merge with the NSDAP after the victory of the National Socialist Revolution in 1933. The unity among the populist groups was visually expressed with the presentation of the flags of the various national associations and volunteer corps in November 1933.


The National Socialists sought to create an economic system that freed the German worker from the corrosive influence of both of the Jewish financed puppet political systems of international Jewry; western Liberal-capitalism and eastern Judeo-Bolshevism. To this end, they rejected the idea that businesses exist for the sake of creating capital, and individuals exist for the purpose of serving businesses. Instead, the National Socialists believed that capital is a means by which businesses can flourish, and that the object of free enterprise is to serve the national worker, not the plutocracy.

Compared with rival ideologies

Devotees and adulators of Liberalism often compare National Socialism with Marxism, stating they are similar. However, considering the essence of the two systems, they are not similar. The same people try to say Liberalism is better to live in than National Socialism. This is also not true for several reasons.

Finally, it is interesting to compare Marxism with Liberalism. Both systems are products of a minority that wishes to lay dry, suppress, and finally eliminate the nation. Among shallow differences, their similarity are obvious: both squander the nation's property while cooking their own soup. Considering the essence, the two systems are rather similar.

National Socialism Liberalism Marxism
Flag of National Socialist Germany.png Liberalizmus.jpg Marxizmus.jpeg
Inner peace: National Socialism wants to realize a universal socialism for the whole nation. Liberalism praises diversity and supports minorities, it tries to disaggregate the nation into elementary parts, rather than to unite it. Marxism praises class socialism, which means a harsh inner fight.
Higher lordship: National Socialism is bound to transcendency. It accepts and believes the existence of a higher might that steers the universe. It keeps the faith, and also the Christian church can operate, if it accepts the National-Socialistic state. Liberalism is materialistic. It tolerates superstition, but does not tolerate or support Christianity, or a state religion, unless it's political correctness. It supports pseudo-religious diversity, and wherever possible, it tries to disorganize Christian faith. Marxism is a materialistic, atheistic ideology. It chases all "religions" except the Jewish "religion".
Ownership: National Socialism keeps the producing tools in private hands, but it states, that the aim of production is to be useful for the nation. In other words, production advances the society, and with it life gets easier and nicer. Liberalism also keeps the producing tools in private hands, however the purpose of production is solely to make the owners richer. Marxism forbids producing tools in private hands, with this it completely suppresses the individual, therefore there is no harmony between the individual and the society.
Economy: National Socialism prefers national products and production against foreign ones, therefore the system economically also supports the existence of the national state. Liberalism supports motion of materials and goods without limit, opposes protection of local production, eliminates customs duty, supports multinational companies. Therefore it endangers inner production and national life. Marxism socializes economy, it aims instead of national production an international-Bolshevistic economy. With this it ravages local production and cripples commerce.
Honor of work: National Socialism supports work on every level. It stops fraud and usury using hard rules, while prizing and honoring every kind of productive and creative work. It also honors the stay-at-home working woman and mother, who cares for her children. Liberalism supports usury and fraud indirectly by not really stopping it by proper regulations. It gives almost free hand to banks to ransack people through usury and financial tricks. Bolshevism creates a stone age, underdeveloped economy, in which neither physical, nor intellectual work is honoured, and it pays starvation wages for all, except for the foreign clique, that usurps the country. .
Family: National Socialism supports a rational social system, especially free schooling up to the university degree, or professional master degree. The frame of medical attendance is created in a way, that medical care is high quality and available for everyone. Liberalism supports family very little, if possible, it eliminates all social care, like schools and medical care. With this it undermines the culture and health of the nation. Bolshevism explicitly attacks family, it forces women to work due its starvation-wage system, and aims to raise children in state supported groups, hoping that they become brainless supporters of bolshevism. Bad school system and medical care undermines the culture and health of the nation. By using compulsory immunization or compulsory marriage advisement, and things like it, intervenes into the most private life of the people.
Housing: National Socialism considers as one of its most important task to provide good quality and payable housing for the people, providing enough living area for each person. It provides, therefore, a very effective construction program that is combined with a family aid program. With this, after 3 or four children, young families do not have to pay interest any more, and also part of their debt is released. Liberalism supports housing, but it does not stop effectively usury and speculation. Therefore it is easily possible that people use their housing due to debts. Bolshevism knowingly refuses all support for housing. People cannot pay for housing from their starvation wages; the Bolshevistic state knowingly stops the development of public utilities and also construction licenses are hard to achieve. The state builds solely bad quality block of flats providing very little living area for a person, and to maintain such block flats is very expensive due to bad construction quality and bad heating systems.
Support of the people: National Socialism considers the state as the property of the people, and it considers each member of the society as valuable person. It does not throw money out the window to support "minorities". Minorities are given a fair chance to become a useful part of the nation by assimilation. Liberalism does not give any support to the members of the nation. In opposite, it is minority-centric, and aims that members of the majority give most of the result of their work to unwanted aliens for immigration and dwelling. Besides that, it gives money to cultural degeneration and wars for alien purposes. Bolshevism does not give any support to members of the nation. In opposite, it supports "proletariat internationalism", members of the nation are harshly drained, and hordes of aliens are imported, as "proletarians to be supported".
Justice: The National Socialistic state refuses to use roman right only, since that prefers material things over human life and morality. National Socialist states use national justice that gives human life and morality at least the same weight, which material things have. The Liberal state uses roman right, that is clearly of materialistic nature. Anglo-Saxon justice uses juror-system, that means, a group of laymen decides over cases, which makes it similar to the Bolshevistic people's courts. The Bolshevistic state is clearly a state without real justice system that is worth of this name. Laws are not publicly known, and the "courts" often decide not by law, but by decrees of the party. Lawyers are not independent, they are treated, as if they were employees of the lawyers' chamber, and they ar often browbeaten by the state. Typical Bolshevistic establishment is the so called "people's court", whose leader is a Bolshevistic (blood)justice, who together with several laymen judges typically people with fabricated accusation to many years prison or to death.
Election system: National Socialism is a leader system. The leader nominates the main administrative personal. The people's opinion is asked directly before important decisions by a voting. In Liberalism there are multiple parties in the parliament, and the ones, that received the most votes, rule the country. Seemingly it is very democratic, however, in reality Zionist powers sitting in the background rule using their snatched money, built in media personnel and other stooges. Real national people are pursued with yelling of "right-wing", and they have no chance in a Liberal state. Bolshevism allows typically only one party, the Bolshevistic one. Voting is nominal, but compulsory. Here the parliament will be put together, however, it has no decision power. Decisions are made by the inner circle of the Bolshevistic party.
Individual freedom: National Socialistic state does not limit the individual freedom, if a person does not pursue activity, which is against the state or the nation. Liberalism does not limit the individual freedom, but if there are people, who dislike the liberal state and they openly say it, or break one of its taboos, like the holocaust mythos, it will punish them for even over 10 years imprisonment just for saying that. Liberal media casts every day hate propaganda against self-driven "terrorism". Marxism suppresses all individual freedoms, it provides complete censorship, no travelling is possible for average people, only the favourites of the nation-alien system can travel, especially to the "West". Bolshevism turns the home of the people to a kind of prison or working camp with this rule.
Associations: National Socialistic state allows all associations, that are not foreign steered (like scouts), and are not enemies of the National Socialistic state or the nation. The National Socialistic associations (Hitler-Jügend, NSDAP, SS) are nationalistic and constructive organizations. The Liberal state allows associations that are not too national oriented from its point of view. It prefers to prohibit national organizations. It gives horrendous amounts of many to protect perverse associations' organisations, like the marches of exhibitionistic homosexuals. The Bolshevistic state tolerates only Zion-Bolshevistic organisations, like the young pioneers, the Communist youth organization, the party and the Bolshevistic "unions". It forbids and chases any other association, especially the Christian associations.
Information for the people: The National Socialistic state informs the people about all events of the world. It does not hinder the movement of information except if the information providers want to destroy the state or the nation from inside. Liberal information is broad, however the information sources are typically Zionistic, and the informations are one sided and biased. Bolshevistic information policy is based on filtering and modifying the informations. Lots of information is suppressed, others are formed into Bolshevistic propaganda text. It tolerates only Bolshevistic press. Even the private usage of typewriters or copying machines is limited or forbidden.
Police force: National Socialism works with a relative small police corp. Members of the police force behave correctly. Liberal police force behaves generally correctly. In a number of cases they show helpless in case of outrage, especially, when "minorities" push around against natives. Bolshevistic police force is trained for brutality and hatred of the people. Bodily outrage by police force is common, instead of protecting the people the protect the ruling foreign clique.
Culture: National Socialism supports native culture that stems from the nation; it provides high quality culture and arts. Liberalism supports multi-culture, which leads to the elimination of the state building nation. It eagerly supports all kinds of degeneration in culture and in arts, there are exhibitions of pictures, that even an ape could have easily painted, Liberalistic films parrot hate of the nation and love for the alien and the perverted. They also eagerly support all kind of sexual perversions. Bolshevism provides a primitive and one sided culture. All written has to praise Marxism, and also art go down to the same level.
Sports: National Socialism considers sports as a mean to become happier and healthier. Sport is available for everybody, and is supported by the state. It is not a business and not a mean to help aliens to infiltrate the National Socialistic state. Liberalism considers sports as a business and as a mean to help to infiltrate the state by aliens. Even the national teams are filled with aliens of different races. Considerable money is used to protect sport events, which are more similar to a circus than to a mean to help people to stay healthy and happy. Bolshevism considers sport to be a mean for propaganda. It supports elite sport, and not mass sport. Sport is the only legal way for people to travel abroad, therefore young people are eager to became sport stars. The state itself is highly dishonest. It states, sport stars are amateurs, even though they nominally have a job, but in reality they do sports all the day.
International cooperation: National Socialism wishes the cooperation of equal nations, its ideology is not based on hatred, since it will cooperate constructively with anyone except of conscious internal parasites. Liberalism constantly conducts Liberal propaganda, it considers Liberal or sometimes Bolshevistic states as preferred partners, it fantasizes about "Western values", and at the same times, states, that those who see through its unfair play, are considered as "enemies" and they try to eliminate these states with propaganda or with war. Bolshevism advertises hatred against all non-Bolshevistic states, calling them "imperialistic" or suppressor", while among the Bolshevistic countries it prefers unprincipled "comrade love" based on adulation.

Further explanation

National Socialism is the opposite of international finance capitalism, i.e. the opposite of globalization. Under National Socialism, engineers would not lose their jobs to outsourcing, and great industrial cities would not be disintegrating and turning back to farmland. There would be no such thing as Goldman Sachs, or the Federal Reserve, or big box stores full of merchandise from China. If China were National Socialist too, the Chinese economy would not depend on exports. Instead of a globalized economy, there would be independent national economies. Countries would generate capital internally instead of depending on foreign investment. International trade would still exist (you could still drive a Honda if that's what you want), but it would be a fraction of what it is now. The financial system would be simple and straightforward; there would be no such thing as "derivatives". The economy would be based on industry and education, not on finance, insurance, real estate, casinos, and prisons.

There would be no dumbing-down policy in the schools or anywhere else.

There would be no TSA pat-downs. No such thing happened in the Reich, nor could it happen. An obscenity like that would be inconceivable. When you go through security at an American airport, the Zionists literally have you by the balls. Under National Socialism, the Zionists would not be running things, with all that that implies for both foreign and domestic policy.

Instead of dying, the oceans would be flourishing. On land, desertification would be reversed. The "cancer industry" would not exist. The environmental and psychological causes of cancer would be addressed, and cancer would be rare. There would be no need to argue about how to pay for health care, because most people would normally stay healthy without "health care" as we know it today.

Students would not have to go into debt to get an education.

Under National Socialism, cities would not be full of drunks and homeless people. There would be no such thing as multiculturalism, political correctness, or affirmative action. Schools would not teach kids to listen to hip-hop. First world countries would not turn themselves into third world countries. Just the opposite: National Socialism represents the gentrification of the world.

I did not know most of this until recently.

Like most people, I grew up believing that National Socialism was a Very Bad Thing. I thought it was all about war and exterminating people. If that were true, then of course it would be a Very Bad Thing. But in fact that is not what National Socialism is about.

When I was in the 9th grade, my world history teacher gave me an extra credit assignment. She asked me to read The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by William Shirer, and write a report on it. That was a pretty stiff assignment for a 9th grader. I read the book all the way through and wrote a report, but the report was not very good. She gave me an A, but in my own mind I knew I did not deserve an A. Some of what I wrote was cribbed from Encyclopedia Britannica. My teacher expected a little too much from her star student. At that age I was not quite ready to read a book of that length and density, hold it all in my mind at once, and write a paper about it. I guess that's where this page is coming from. Fifty years later, I am still working on that assignment. Anyway I believed everything in the book. And why not? It never occurred to me that my teacher might be misinformed, or that mainstream historians such as William Shirer might be lying. I accepted what they told me.

Since then I have discovered that what happened in Germany in the Hitler era was very different from what they tell us. On this page I am going to present some of the facts that my world history teacher should have taught me. This is what every high school student should know about National Socialism.

The question "what is National Socialism" can be approached in two ways - (1) what was Hitler's original idea? and (2) what happened in the Third Reich?


Enemy distortions

See also: Propaganda lies about National Socialism.
Statement Reality
National Socialists set up categories of nations, and considered some to be of lower value They just said that Germans are not worse than any other nation, and deserve the opportunity to develop free from internationalist influence.
They considered only the Germans or Germanic nations as Aryan. According to National Socialist doctrine, all non-Jewish Europeans are Aryans. Nords are listed at the top.
The "new man" despises democracy, he is therefore outrageous and brutal. This is typical Judeo-Bolshevist combination sale: despising the Jewish democracy does not follow outrage or brutality. This is a flawed and fallacious theory as is the socially liberal idea of democracy, and more specifically under the liberal-capitalist system we have financial democracies which effectively function for a plutocracy to control.
The most valuable human race is German. It is created to be master of all nations. The other nations (English, French, ...) even more the Slavic ones, and also Hungarians are created to be slaves of the Germans. The National Socialists acknowledged the right of all nations to establish a national homeland; the drive east (Ostiedlung) was accompanied by large scale population transfers, with the goal being the displacement of Tatar and Turkic hordes who had conquered the formerly Aryan nations of west Asia.
Jews must be exterminated. That is, the central program of National Socialism was "antisemitism". Jews proved countless times their inability to coexist with, and even their hostility against, their hosts. National Socialists did not endeavor to exterminate them, but simply encouraged emigration. The Jews were deported to camps as a preventative measure to insurrection and sabotage of the German war effort.
Gypsies must be exterminated. National Socialists did not especially care for Gypsies. Wherever Gypsies stole, bullied or murdered, they were punished and deported into camps, as any other person. As relatively recent immigrants to Europe from South Asia, the Gypsies were acknowledged as foreign, and the Germans sought to repatriate them to their ethnic homeland.
Germans are better than any other nation, and therefore the National Socialists sought world domination. The National Socialists never stated that other European nations are created for slavery. In fact, this aggressive and ethnocentric proposition is to be found in the Jewish Talmud, wherein only the Jew is a human, and the gentile nations were created solely for the purpose of serving the Jews, and is shown in the Jewish doctrines of Zionism, Trotskyism, Cultural Bolshevism, neoconservatism, and neoliberalism.
Communists are also Jews or allies of Jews, therefore they must be exterminated. Gentiles who had been deceived by the Jews into following Communism were permitted to live in the National Socialist state, provided they renounce their views and honestly broke with Jewish terror.
A racially clean, Aryan people state must be created, that is led by an elite explicitly bred for such purpose. The elite is impeccable. National Socialists honored women, family, and loved their children. There was no forced or coercive breeding of any kind. The population growth of the 1930s and early 1940s was a consequence of increased German faith in their future, and the Lebensborn program was developed to spread the Nordic phenotype of the Aryan race.


What if Germany Won World War II?
Why Hitler Wasn't Evil
National Socialist Glory - The Perfect Society
The Anthem of National Socialist Germany
Adolf Hitler - Man against time
The Nazi-Sozi: Q&A for National-Socialists
"Imperium - The Movie To Smear Trump" by Ramzpaul

See also

  • Economics -- discusses economics of National Socialism in more depth



  • Dr. Arthur Pillans Laurie: "The Case for Germany. A Study of Modern Germany", Internationaler Verlag Berlin, 1939 (The book in HTML)

External links

Part of this article consists of modified text from Metapedia (which sadly became a Zionist shill), page Socialism and/or Wikipedia (is liberal-bolshevistic), page Socialism, and the article is therefore licensed under GFDL.