UK arrested Tommy Robinson for reporting child-rape gangs that the government caters to. The UK banned reporting of his arrest, denied him a lawyer, and is trying to have him assassinated in prison. Regardless of how you feel about his views, this is a totalitarian government.
Tommy Robinson isn't the first to that the UK has jailed after a secret trial. Melanie Shaw tried to expose child abuse in a Nottinghamshire kids home -- it wasn't foreigners doing the molesting, but many members of the UK's parliament. The government kidnapped her child and permanently took it away. Police from 3 forces have treated her like a terrorist and themselves broken the law. Police even constantly come by to rob her phone and money. She was tried in a case so secret the court staff had no knowledge of it. Her lawyer, like Tommy's, wasn't present. She has been held for over 2 years in Peterborough Prison. read, read
The British Empire was the largest empire in history and for a substantial time was the foremost global power. At its height during the Victorian era, it represented an alliance between Jewish finance and élite Masonic "Protestant" administration, united to spread liberal-capitalism around the world. It was a product of the European age of discovery, which began with the maritime explorations of the 15th century, that sparked the era of the European colonial empires.
By 1921, the British Empire held sway over a population of about 458 million people, approximately one-quarter of the world's population. It covered about 36.6 million km² (14.2 million square miles), about a quarter of Earth's total land area. As a result, its legacy is widespread, in legal and governmental systems, economic practice, militarily, educational systems, sports (such as cricket, rugby and football), and in the global spread of the English language. At the peak of its power, it was often said that "the sun never sets on the British Empire" because its span across the globe ensured that the sun was always shining on at least one of its numerous colonies or subject nations.
During the five decades following World War II, most of the territories of the Empire seized to be under the overt governance of the imperial flag. Many went on to join the British Commonwealth, a supposed "free" association of "independent" states. Just as the British Empire was preceded by the Jewish-Dutch Empire, it was succeeded by the contemporary Jewish-American Empire.
The problem of defining the scope, function and timeline of the empire itself, raises first the fundamental question of definition: "what is the nature and purpose of the British Empire?" In Medieval times previously, powers which came to be based in Britain, for example the Plantagenet monarchy, had established a traditional feudal imperium, which also covered much of what is today France as well. However, this was very much part of the traditional European model of Christian feudalism and cannot be compared to the system which later developed based on the City of London and thus is not usually viewed as within the scope of the British Empire.
The three defining philosophical aspects of the British Empire system are as follows: (1) emphasis on trade (2) Protestantism and (3) an alliance with and sympathy for Jews against the Catholic powers of Europe (particularly Spain and France). The system was not a hyper-nationalism of the English nation (as is sometimes claimed by some Masonic Lowland Scots, such as Robbie Burns, who try to cover-up their leading role in the enterprise behind the mist of romanticism), but one based upon the idea of oligarchy and gaining trading monopolies for the elite clique of participants in it. The masses of England itself became the first serfs to the City of London plutocracy, before it spread out elsewhere. In this sense it was inline philosophically with the Venetian Empire and Dutch Empire which were powerful before it.
|“||Jewish financial and business interests were important participants in the imperialist enterprise. For example, the Indian railroad network that the Sassoons helped to finance was closely integrated into the imperial administration, and Julius Reuter's wire service functioned as the command and control mechanism of the colonial government. Upon occasion, the British government also turned to Jewish banking houses to finance imperial expansion. Disraeli's purchase of the Suez Canal in 1878, for example, was made possible by Henry Oppenheim's extensive contacts in Egypt and a four million pound loan from Lionel Rothschild. The role played by Jewish capital in the creation of Britain's nineteenth-century empire was not lost on its critics. In his classic work, which became the basis of Lenin’s theory of imperialism, J. A. Hobson argued that "men of a single and peculiar race, who have behind them centuries of financial experience," formed "the central ganglion of international capitalism."||”|
|— Benjamin Ginsberg,✡ The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, 1999.|
|“||Empire, of course, was also a field for pursuit of profit. The house of Rothschild concerned itself mainly with loans to governments and public bodies. However, in the 1890s it became heavily involved in diamond and gold mining on the Rand. When Alfred Beit and Julius Wernher floated Rand Mines in February 1893, Rothschilds were alloted 27,000 of the 100,000 shares. The scandals that beset the Edwardian Jewish plutocracy also illustrate Jews' involvement in the empire as a money making enterprise. The Marconi scandal of 1912, is it well known, centered on the allegation that four Liberal cabinet minister stood to profit from a contract awarded to the English Marconi Company. Two of the cabinet ministers in question — Sir Rufus Isaacs and Herbert Samuel — were Jews. The head of the English Marconi Company was Geoffrey Isaacs, the brother of Sir Rufus.||”|
|— David Feldman,✡ Jews and the British Empire, 2007.|
|“||Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also.||”|
|— L.G. Pine, Tales of the British Aristocracy, 1956.|
|“||How can you make out that we are in this country for any purpose except to steal? It’s so simple. The official holds the Burman down while the businessman goes through his pockets. The British Empire is simply a device for giving trade monopolies to the English — or rather to gangs of Jews and Scotchmen.||”|
|— George Orwell, Burmese Days, 1934.|
Lowland Scot Empire Loyalist in occupied Ireland.
- The Cousinhood, headed up by the Rothschild crime family.
- White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, used to administrate the project.
- Royal Institute of International Affairs, pushing same agenda.
- The Economist, the main British Imperialist printed media.
- Telescopic philanthropy, "we abolished slavery, don't you know."
- American Empire, another Jew-infested empire.
- Ottoman Empire, another Jew-infested empire.
- German Empire, another Jew-infested empire.
- Dutch Empire, another Jew-infested empire.
- Free to Cheat: “Jewish Emancipation” and the Anglo-Jewish Cousinhood by Andrew Joyce at The Occidental Observer
- How the Portuguese Secret Jews (Marranos) Saved England by Manuel Azevedo (in Jewish)
- Against Oligarchy: The British Empire and the Venetian Party by Webster Griffin Tarpley