UK arrested Tommy Robinson for reporting child-rape gangs that the government caters to. The UK banned reporting of his arrest, denied him a lawyer, and is trying to have him assassinated in prison. Regardless of how you feel about his views, this is a totalitarian government.
Tommy Robinson isn't the first to that the UK has jailed after a secret trial. Melanie Shaw tried to expose child abuse in a Nottinghamshire kids home -- it wasn't foreigners doing the molesting, but many members of the UK's parliament. The government kidnapped her child and permanently took it away. Police from 3 forces have treated her like a terrorist and themselves broken the law. Police even constantly come by to rob her phone and money. She was tried in a case so secret the court staff had no knowledge of it. Her lawyer, like Tommy's, wasn't present. She has been held for over 2 years in Peterborough Prison. read, read
Anti-racism is pretty popular these days. Even Hitler is anti-racist today. Please watch the brief video below before continuing on.
Anti-racism sounds good in theory, but in reality it all came from Cultural Marxism. Cultural Marxism began in 1919 when the leaders of the former Soviet Union noticed that Communism wasn't making the poor any better off, instead it made everyone but the people at the top poor. So the Communist leaders created what today is called Cultural Marxism. It blames all the world's problems on white people and then seeks to exterminate all white people and all European culture. Also white pride is considered negative while pride of all other groups is considered positive. "Hate speech" of course means a white person criticizing another group but anyone attacking white people is not prosecuted as hate speech. The general philosophy of anti-racists is that "only white people can be racist", "nothing can be racist against white people", and that anti-racist is a code-word for anti-white.
The term "Racism"
Many on the political Right reject the cultural Marxist politically correct hate-word terms such as "racism" as being defined and used in such a way as to be Marxist concepts (which they are as radical egalitarian theories applied to race). The definition of racism itself is poor, and according to Merriam-Webster, the term "racism" is defined as "poor treatment of or violence against people because of their race and "the belief that some races of people are better than others". On the first part of the definition, this term "racism" is fallaciously applied to counter-Semitic people and opponents of international Jewry as people that are so-called "anti-Semites", although the Jews deserve poor treatment and violence, and therefore it usually isn't wrong to ever treat a Jew that way because of his race, and it isn't true violence to to punish criminals physically. The Jews are a psychologically collectivist race of Jewish supremacists inspired by the wicked Talmud, they hate Gentiles as they hate their culture, and they are especially venomously anti-White, and have been destroying civilization with Globalism, cultural degeneracy, and international Jewry works towards this. The second part of the definition is racialism. Racialism is also portrayed negatively by Marxists, and as "racism". According to the Oxford English Dictionary the term “Racists” was coined by Leon Trotsky in 1930 in an article attacking the Slavophiles.. Leon Trotsky used the term "racism" as early as 1933. Deracination ideology is a major focus of neo-Marxism. Merriam Webster dates the term 'racism' to 1933 and defines it as such; a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race. The term "racialism" from the early Twentieth Century "The two principal planks in the party platform are opposition to all racialism and cooperation with the government." 1907 
Arguments of the anti-racists
More difference within groups than between
The geneticist Richard Lewontin measured the variation within races and populations and between races, with the result that 85% of the variation between individuals occurred within the same race, and only 15% between races. The argument is that this shows that racial differences are insignificant. A flaw in this argument is that this statistic refers to an average of variation over several factors; individual genetic loci show more variation; and a 2003 paper criticized this conclusion. For example, the variation in genes for skin colour do not follow that pattern. Also, even if in individual factors like intelligence there is significant overlap of the distributions, the effect at the extremes (very intelligent and very stupid) is magnified, with great effect on the nature of society. See the Race and intelligence article for more information.
Synecdoche of skin color
The assertion is sometimes made that those who believe in "racism" are merely desiring to discriminate between people on the basis of skin color. Those making this claim realize that there is more difference than merely skin color, but use this argument both to trivialize the differences between races and also as a proxy for claiming that differences between races are only cosmetic. White is not a color, and so the White race doesn't really have a skin color as how it is defined or very often so looks and is more than that. Genetics and blood are deeper than skin and color.
Some theorists have suggested that the concept of "race" should be replaced by the idea of a cline. A cline refers to a gradual shift in a characteristic over a geographical area. The argument is that because, looking at some factors, populations cannot be clearly divided into distinct groups, that the concept of a race as a method for dividing the human species cannot be used. The counter-argument is that just because in some cases variation is not clear-cut, does not mean that this variation is not important, or even that it does not exist.
A related concept is race as a social construct. This defines race as an arbitrary invention of human societies, a cultural distinction defining who is part of the race and who isn't. Although the way that people are viewed, depending on their hereditary characteristics, is an important part of the functioning of society, that does not mean that the basis for such a distinction is purely cultural, and does not reflect a genetic reality. Although the definition of a race can change with time, and although it may have fringes and gradations, there are still significant hereditary differences between different groups of people.
Hate or survival
Many of the people behind the movement are whites who are racist against their own race.
"Anti-Racist" events even turn away white people purely because white. For example, the Racialized Students’ Collective had a white man and woman try to attend and turned them away because they were not "victims of racialization".
Anti racist argue often, that racially awakened people "hate" a specific group of people because they are a certain race, and anti-racism means, obviously, not hating any group at all, and instead respecting their ancestry and native culture. This argumentation is hypocritical. Racially awakened people do not hate any other person because he/she is of a certain race, but they want to keep the geographical separation of races, as they naturally formed. Aggressiveness and tendency to criminality is different between races. Geographic separation of races is necessary for the less aggressive races simply to survive. So called anti-racists hate less aggressive races, especially whites, and they wish race mixture everywhere in order, so that less aggressive races die out.
- Anti Racist Action
- Anti-Racist Canada
- Black Supremacy
- Cultural Marxism
- Critical theory
- Frankfurt School
- Hate speech
- How racist are you test
- Montréal Anti-Racist Action
- Political correctness
- Racial anthropology
- The Mantra
- Daily Chronicle, 2 Jan. 6/5 (OED)